Achtung: diese Seite wird nur zu Testzwecken betrieben. Hier gelangen Sie zur Madipedia-Website: https://madipedia.de
Preservice Teachers’ Patterns of Metacognitive Behavior During Mathematics Problem Solving in a Dynamic Geometry Environment: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
[gesichtete Version] | [gesichtete Version] |
(Dissertation von Ana Kuzle eingestellt) |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
Zeile 19: | Zeile 19: | ||
| stufe = <!-- Primarstufe, Sekundarstufe 1, Sekundarstufe 2, ... --> | | stufe = <!-- Primarstufe, Sekundarstufe 1, Sekundarstufe 2, ... --> | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Zusammenfassung == | == Zusammenfassung == | ||
As an experienced and passionate problem solver for years, I wanted to better understand the metacognition that students exhibit when solving nonroutine geometry problems in a dynamic geometry environment. In this study, dynamic tool software—namely, the Geometer’s Sketchpad—was used by the participants. My intention was to focus on participants’ decision making, reflection, reasoning, and problem solving as well as to understand what situations and interactions in a dynamic geometry environment promote metacognitive behavior. | As an experienced and passionate problem solver for years, I wanted to better understand the metacognition that students exhibit when solving nonroutine geometry problems in a dynamic geometry environment. In this study, dynamic tool software—namely, the Geometer’s Sketchpad—was used by the participants. My intention was to focus on participants’ decision making, reflection, reasoning, and problem solving as well as to understand what situations and interactions in a dynamic geometry environment promote metacognitive behavior. | ||