Benjamin Rott/Publikationen: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

K
keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
[gesichtete Version][gesichtete Version]
KKeine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 41: Zeile 41:
* [[Lars Holzäpfel|Holzäpfel, Lars]]; Rott, Benjamin & Dreher, Ulrike (2016). Exploring perpendicular bisectors: The water well problem. In Ana Kuzle; Benjamin Rott & Tatjana Hodnik Čadež (Hrsg.)'','' ''Problem Solving in the Mathematics Classroom – Perspectives and Practices from Different Countries'' (S. 117 – 130). Münster: WTM
* [[Lars Holzäpfel|Holzäpfel, Lars]]; Rott, Benjamin & Dreher, Ulrike (2016). Exploring perpendicular bisectors: The water well problem. In Ana Kuzle; Benjamin Rott & Tatjana Hodnik Čadež (Hrsg.)'','' ''Problem Solving in the Mathematics Classroom – Perspectives and Practices from Different Countries'' (S. 117 – 130). Münster: WTM
* Schindler, Maike & Rott, Benjamin (2016). Networking theories on giftedness – What we can learn from synthesizing Renzulli’s domain general and Krutetskii’s mathematics-specific theory. ''Education Sciences 2017,'' 7(1).
* Schindler, Maike & Rott, Benjamin (2016). Networking theories on giftedness – What we can learn from synthesizing Renzulli’s domain general and Krutetskii’s mathematics-specific theory. ''Education Sciences 2017,'' 7(1).
* Rott, Benjamin (2016). Problem solving in the classroom: The role of beliefs in the organization of lessons with the subject problem solving. In Torsten Fritzlar, Daniela Aßmus, Kerstin Bräuning, Ana Kuzle & Benjamin Rott (Hrsg.), ''<nowiki/>'Problem solving in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 2015 joint conference of ProMath and the GDM working group on problem solving'' (S. 201 – 213). Münster: WTM.
* Rott, Benjamin (2016). Problem solving in the classroom: The role of beliefs in the organization of lessons with the subject problem solving. In Torsten Fritzlar, Daniela Aßmus, [[Kerstin Bräuning]], Ana Kuzle & Benjamin Rott (Hrsg.), ''<nowiki/>'Problem solving in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 2015 joint conference of ProMath and the GDM working group on problem solving'' (S. 201 – 213). Münster: WTM.
* Herold-Blasius, Raja & Rott, Benjamin (2016). Using Strategy Keys as a Tool to Influence Strategy Behaviour – A Qualitative Study. In Torsten Fritzlar, Daniela Aßmus, Kerstin Bräuning, Ana Kuzle & Benjamin Rott (Hrsg.), '''Problem solving in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 2015 joint conference of ProMath and the GDM working group on problem solving'' (S. 137 – 148). Münster: WTM.
* Herold-Blasius, Raja & Rott, Benjamin (2016). Using Strategy Keys as a Tool to Influence Strategy Behaviour – A Qualitative Study. In Torsten Fritzlar, Daniela Aßmus, Kerstin Bräuning, Ana Kuzle & Benjamin Rott (Hrsg.), '''Problem solving in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 2015 joint conference of ProMath and the GDM working group on problem solving'' (S. 137 – 148). Münster: WTM.
* Joklitschke, Julia, Rott, Benjamin, & Schindler, Maike (2016). Measuring mathematical creativity: Towards a confirmation and refinement of a test instrument. In Torsten Fritzlar, Daniela Aßmus, Kerstin Bräuning, Ana Kuzle & Benjamin Rott (Hrsg.), ''<nowiki/>'Problem solving in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 2015 joint conference of ProMath and the GDM working group on problem solving'' (S. 149 – 158)''. Münster: WTM.''
* Joklitschke, Julia, Rott, Benjamin, & Schindler, Maike (2016). Measuring mathematical creativity: Towards a confirmation and refinement of a test instrument. In Torsten Fritzlar, Daniela Aßmus, Kerstin Bräuning, Ana Kuzle & Benjamin Rott (Hrsg.), ''<nowiki/>'Problem solving in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 2015 joint conference of ProMath and the GDM working group on problem solving'' (S. 149 – 158)''. Münster: WTM.''